1. Views from the capitals for 2018

1. Views from the capitals for 2018
ЭТУ ПУБЛИКАЦИЮ ПРОЧИТАЛИ  61%  ПОСЕТИТЕЛЕЙ.

1. Views from the capitals for 2018

Germany     Great Britain   Europe    Polska

GEOMETR.IT       ecfr.eu

 

*European dreams and fears  for 2018

INTRODUCTION

The EU has seemingly survived the existential crises of the Brexit vote, the ascent of Donald Trump, and the rise of the far right across the continent. But the union and its international influence remain fragile. The populist wave may have peaked, but it has certainly not passed; refugee deals with Turkey and Libya are under threat, and the southern and eastern neighbourhoods remain turbulent. Against this backdrop, we asked our national offices to outline their governments’ greatest hope and greatest fear for foreign and European policy in 2018.  

BERLIN

by Josef Janning

Years ago Angela Merkel used to respond to questions about the near future that ‘Europe will emerge stronger from the crisis’. In 2017, times have changed. Jean Claude Juncker may have felt ‘fresh winds in the sails’ of Europe, but that is mostly because the ship did not sink in the election storms of Austria, the Netherlands, and France.

Compared to 2016, 2017 might look like a turnaround. But from Berlin’s perspective, 2018 will be more significant, not least because of the protracted search for a German government, which is costing Europe at least six months of political momentum.

For Berlin, the best hope for Europe in 2018 is to muddle through. Specifically, the hope is that there will be no new spike in refugee flows, and that Europe will be spared another major terrorist attack or a significant rise of the crime rate among migrant communities. Such a respite would allow some much-needed time to develop, debate and decide a more robust response to the migration challenge.

There will be little room for high flying plans like Macron’s agenda as outlined in his Sorbonne speech. Martin Schulz’s ‘United States of Europe’ will not come any closer in the next twelve months, either.

The centrifugal trend will remain strong over the coming year. Despite a favourable economic outlook, the German political class seems to prefer smaller steps over grand designs, largely due to a fear of failure. Berlin needs a low intensity year to avoid being pushed onto the defensive while trying to keep up some pressure for reform.

As to the greatest worry, the German view would focus on risks beyond Europe. Matters on the continent are not good, but seem predictable even in the worst case scenarios. A major conflict involving great powers would be a crisis of different dimension.

The greatest worry would thus be an escalation of the Korean crisis, at some point triggering a US military strike to destroy North Korea’s nuclear capability, with substantial collateral damage ending many lives on the Korean peninsula. Should the North Korean regime survive such a strike, a ‘political nuclear winter’ could follow, as relations between the US and China would freeze over, extending into the regional alliance system and international trade.

While geographically far away from the epicenter of conflict, Europe would be significantly hit by its fallout: Transatlantic relations would take another blow; Europe’s economy could fall victim to a new Cold War in East Asia, and the nuclear non-proliferation system could break down, triggering nuclear arms races in regions closer to Europe.

The bigger the nuclear casualties, the deeper the fall in political temperature of world affairs is likely to be, with a rules-based international order disintegrating further and great power confrontation becoming the dominant paradigm.

The indirect shock might even be more detrimental to Europe than a direct blow such as the refugee crisis of 2015/16: Though Europe might be less affected than countries in wider East Asia, the shake-up could deepen the cracks in the EU’s construction rather than lead to a closer cooperation.

have to happen in the most disastrous way possible.

* The publication is not an editorial. It reflects solely the point of view and argumentation of the author. The publication is presented in the presentation. Start in the previous issue. The original is available at:    http://ecfr.eu

* * *

GEOMETR.IT

Счастливого Нового Года!  29.12.2017

С Праздником Рождества Христова! 29.12.2017

A Joyous New Year!  29.12.2017

Frohes Neues Jahr!  29.12.2017

Wesołych świąt i szczęśliwego nowego roku!  29.12.2017

РОЖДЕСТВО. Письмо из ссылки. 1937 год  29.12.2017

РОЖДЕСТВО в Москве. Иван Шмелев 29.12.2017

GEOMETR.IT

, , , , , , ,

5 comments

  1. Schwarzfahrer
    Ответить

    David Cameron’s memoirs will be written in the style of Fyodor Dostoevsky’s Crime and Punishment. They will be very good, even if they were composed in a shepherd’s hut painted Farrow & Ball’s Mole’s Breath in his garden. He will become editor of the London Review of Books and move from Notting Hill to Primrose Hill. His regrets will be none.

  2. Elmar Brick
    Ответить

    A snowballing sexual harassment scandal in Parliament and divisions over Brexit will coalesce into a force strong enough to bring down Theresa May’s government. The Labour Party’s Jeremy Corbyn will become U.K. Prime Minister and will try to complete Brexit negotiations with the EU (hoping to create a socialist paradise outside the “neoliberal” EU’s Single Market). The foreign exchange and bond markets will push back, hard.

  3. Tatjana Kizkan
    Ответить

    The European Union will levy another heavy fine on Google for abuse of its dominance of the Android system. It will also reject the tech giant’s proposed fixes in its other ongoing case over rigging shopping results. Look for Bing to make inroads.

  4. Daniel Donk
    Ответить

    Do you think we’re overdue for a decline and that the phrase “ ‘tormented bulls’ best describes investor mentality”?

Добавить комментарий

Ваш e-mail не будет опубликован.