How Worlds are Made, and Unmade

How Worlds are Made, and Unmade
ЭТУ ПУБЛИКАЦИЮ ПРОЧИТАЛИ  94%  ПОСЕТИТЕЛЕЙ.

How Worlds are Made, and Unmade

EX-USSR    GERMANY  UNITED KINGDOM   Poland USA

 

* The liberal, rules-based international order did not take shape predominantly as a consequence of highmindedness, but as a sphere of influence. 

YOUTUBE 2018  Stephen Kotkin: Sphere of Influence I — The Gift of Geopolitics: How Worlds are Made, and Unmade

That, moreover, was to a great extent inspired, and sustained, by a comprehensive cold war with the Soviet Union (or Second World, as it was once called).  The sphere of influence known as the West played a significant part in European integration, spurred phenomenal global investments in science and research, gave additional impetus to desegregation and civil rights in the U.S, and more.  Above all, the formation, consolidation, and maintenance of a sphere of influence disciplined American power.  It even made possible an American grand strategy.  Is any of that possible anymore?  Will we now see the successful construct of enduring alternative spheres of influence, alongside a permanent decline of the Western one?  Or are we overreacting to a misunderstood historical conjuncture?

Lecture I: The Gift of Geopolitics: How Worlds are Made, and Unmade

Americans and Europeans long tended to think of geopolitics as a kind of primitivism to be transcended.  The “escape from geopolitics” has both a right wing and a left wing incarnation: the former rooted in a fantasy of universal democracy and benign US-led hegemony, the latter, in a world order governed by supranational institutions and pooled sovereignty.  What both share is a conviction that the rivalry of states, with conflicting interests and worldviews, produces conflict, insecurity and impoverishment.  Hence the “return” of geopolitics today is lamented.  But should it be?  Interstate rivalry can unleash cataclysm, of course, but the wealthy, democratic West arose not in spite of geopolitics but as a result of it.  The question therefore is not whether geopolitics is escapable or bad, but how the inevitable interstate frictions can be harnessed to push the major powers security and prosperity.

* The publication is not an editorial. It reflects solely the point of view and argumentation of the author. The publication is presented in the presentation. Start in the previous issue. The original is available at: IWMVienna

* * *

GEOMETR.IT  

С праздником ПАСХИ НЕТЛЕННОЙ!  13.04.2018

ООН. Доклад о ситуации с правами человека в Украине   13.04.2018

The Balkans in a split with the EU   13.04.2018

Deutschland sinkt langsam  13.04.2018

Europa: vom Kopf auf die Füße  13.04.2018

Nastroje Ukraińców ?  13.04.2018

The world’s pressing challenges.  13.04.2018

GEOMETR.IT 

 

, , , , , , , ,

5 comments

  1. Rum Pum PUM
    Ответить

    However Europe military occupied by USA and silent hatred for USA keeps growing, brewing. Germany and Japan still USA regime military outposts. USA regime largest weapon sales always first to kill, nukes ,napalm, depleted Uranium, agent orange, cluster bombs, DRONE kills that flood Europe with refugees and fear.

  2. V for Victory
    Ответить

    The key issues are the prevention of Russia and Europe developing closer trade and political ties — stemming primarily from a vast trade in energy fuels; and, secondly, the survival of the American dollar as the world’s reserve currency.

  3. YULO
    Ответить

    A close relationship between Moscow and Europe would remove the rationale for America’s military role in NATO and thereby its political influence in Europe.

Добавить комментарий

Ваш e-mail не будет опубликован.