1. Game of Trolls in the UK

in Economics 2017 · EN · Europe 2017 · EX-USSR · Finance 2017 · Germany 2017 · Great Britain 2017 · Industry 2017 · Nation 2017 · Person 2017 · Philosophy · Skepticism 2017 · State 2017 211 views / 8 comments
          
78% посетителей прочитало эту публикацию

 Baltics      Germany     Great Britain  Europe                 

GEOMETR.IT    capx.co

 

Schadenfreude is the sparkling wine of choice in Remain circles this Christmas -and you can see why

Yes, Brexit must happen.

No, Brexit doesn’t have to happen in the most disastrous way possible

What really matters is a smooth Brexit

I suppose there must be more exasperating things in the modern world than the constant use of the word “iconic” but sometimes, as when the Prime Minister no less praises the return of the “iconic” blue British passport, it is hard to think of many.

Invariably what is described as “iconic” is ordinary to the point of banality. You cannot move in today’s Britain without bumping into something iconic. I dare say that in some god-forsaken corner of the country there is even an “iconic” multi-storey car park.

Still, that cannot excuse the Prime Minister’s trolling. This morning she, or more likely one of her junior apparatchiks, tweeted that “The UK passport is an expression of our independence and sovereignty – symbolising our citizenship of a proud, great nation. That’s why we have announced that the iconic #bluepassport will return after we leave the European Union in 2019.” Well, bully for you Mrs May. Sometimes it seems as though Brexit is a Game of Trolls and, certainly, if you wanted to reduce Remainer Twitter to a state of umbrage-taking apoplexy you could hardly wish to do better than this.

Of course, Brexit-supporting tabloids cheered the return of blue passports. That is what they do. The symbolic must be elevated above the vital. We may have to live in caves after Brexit but, by jingo, if we wish to visit other troglodytes elsewhere we shall do so with our passage guaranteed by the “iconic” blue passport. That will show them. Or, as Nigel Farage trumpeted, this is “the first real tangible victory” Brexit has enjoyed.

At times like these it takes an effort to remember that Theresa May would like you to think her an uncommonly serious politician. I am not sure how useful descending to Farageist levels of nincompoopery is but I dare say there must be a reason for it. Because otherwise why would you wish to look so ridiculous?

But let it also be noted that plenty of Remainers are happy to play this game too. Confirmation bias is the strongest currency in Britain right now (certainly stronger than the poor old pound) and this is true regardless of which side of the great Brexit divide you happen to be. For every blimpish Leaver thrilled by the return of the iconic passport there is an ardent Remainer thrilled by this confirmation that Brexit is nothing more than a matter of stuff and nonsense, pomp and circumstance. Only blimps and oiks and bigots and imperial nostalgists could really have voted for this absurdity, right? 

Well, it is true that the symbolic aspects of Brexit have indeed often been couched in these terms. That’s how you create and sustain a culture war, after all. And it is equally true that it takes a special forbearance not to care about something which makes Nigel Farage so very happy.

Even so, some things are worth not caring about and the colour of the United Kingdom’s passports is one of those things. Those Remainers working up a lather today might care to remember that, since this is a case of a new contract being issued, there is no actual cost involved in changing from burgundy to blue.

But the reaction to this storm in an espresso cup remains revealing. It is possible to think Brexit a terrible blunder – worse, politically-speaking, than a crime – while also accepting that there is a terrible smugness at the heart of some Remainer discourse. This is so even if you also accept that much of the case for Leave was based on, at best, meretricious twaddle and, more often, on a pandering to the baser elements of the electorate’s elemental fears.

Be that as it may, we are where we are even if that is not where many of us hoped we would find ourselves. This being so and 18 months after the referendum – long enough, frankly, for ardour to have cooled – some choices must be made.

If you think Brexit a mistake – and I do – the question is whether mocking the delusions of the most fanatical Leavers is worth your, or anyone else’s, time any more? I am not sure it really is, you know. There comes a point at which sensible Remain voters who regret the country’s choice last June but accept it must come with certain disagreeable consequences, resolve to make the best of a sub-optimal lot. Allow the Leavers their symbolic triumphs and concentrate, instead, on the substance of trying to lessen the likely disadvantages of our post-Brexit future.

This will not be easy, not least since hardline Brexiteers recognise neither the value nor the need for compromise. Nevertheless it is an enterprise that must be attempted. The Tory “mutineers” assailed by the Brexiteer press seem to be some of the few people who actually understand this. Yes, Brexit must happen. No, Brexit doesn’t have to happen in the most disastrous way possible.

* The publication is not an editorial. It reflects solely the point of view and argumentation of the author. The publication is presented in the presentation. Start in the previous issue. The original is available at : http://capx.co

* * *

GEOMETR.IT

РОЖДЕСТВО и РЕФЕРЕНДУМ. Жестко и без сочувствия  22.12.2017

ПОЛЬША и АННА КАРЕНИНА 22.12.2017

ВЫШЕГРАД. Покажет ли он твердый средний палец ЕВРОПЕ НУДНОЙ ?  22.12.2017

РОССИИ — санкции, а ГЕРМАНИИ — пояс девственности!  22.12.2017

В 2018 году начинается ПРОШЛОЕ или БУДУЩЕЕ ? 22.12.2017

Mołdawia: Dwóch byłych premierów 22.12.2017

DIE OSTALGIE hat eigenen Geschmack  22.12.2017

Ukraine. Eine erinnerungskulturelle Zerreißprobe 22.12.2017

Ukraine strikes back 22.12.2017

The next round of Balkan never ending story 22.12.2017

GEOMETR.IT

8 Comments

  1. I’m a passionate remainer. There’s nothing I’d rather see than the back of Brexit.

    Don’t underestimate the civil and social unrest and upheaval that would come with such a move by the political establishment.

    Another vote on the final deal, by referendum or general election is the only possible solution.

  2. And if it’s difficult now, imagine how impossible it will be in a couple of decades’ time. When there is a single EU army and a single EU treasury. Someone at some point will force the Swedes into the euro on the basis that they are obliged to join and keeping the krona is an unfair advantage. Also at some point someone will point out that lower minimum wages in east European members is an unfair competitive advantage. Pound to a penny that will mean levelling down rather than up.

  3. And the democratic oversight for all this? Voting for a parliament that cannot even initiate legislation. A parliament which the EU’s President has called ridiculous.

  4. Never say never in politics. Other countries have repeated refererenda on the EU. It would be an act of political folly to say that any decision cannot be revisited. We are barely closer to brexit than when the referendum took place, let’s see how people feel when the economy slows down further and inflation races ahead of earnings.

  5. It is precisely this kind of simplistic portrayal of the leaving process which is the problem. Many hardcore leavers give the impression is it as simple as walking out the dor when the pub closes, however exiting without any agreements in place means the door leads straigh off a tall cliff.

  6. If the EU collapses then enjoy living in a world with the USA and China (and to an extent Russia) as the only entities with any influence.

  7. Except we won’t, because when it all turns to shit, the quitters will simply howl that it’s still all the EU’s fault, that they’re getting their revenge on us, that they’re poisoning our chances behind our backs.These people never learn from their mistakes, they continue to blame everyone else for them.

  8. I understand the point of the article, because there’s been a distinct, growing ‘November Criminals’ narrative from the Mail/Sun/Express/Telegraph. ‘Enemies of the People’, ‘Crush the Saboteurs’, absolutely no exaggeration to say that those headlines could’ve been Goebbels handiwork.

Добавить комментарий

Your email address will not be published.

Latest from

Go to Top