1. Negotiating the EU’s shifted relationship

in Conflicts 2017 · Crisis 2017 · Economics 2017 · EN · Europe 2017 · EX-USSR · Finance 2017 · Germany 2017 · Great Britain 2017 · Nation 2017 · Person 2017 · Politics 2017 192 views / 6 comments
          
68% посетителей прочитало эту публикацию

Balkans     Baltics       Germany     Great Britain   Europe    

GEOMETR.IT      stratfor.com

 

From its very inception, the European Union has depended on the alliance between France and Germany. The bloc’s predecessor, the European Economic Community, formed with the principal goal of binding the two countries together so closely that another war on the Continent would be impossible. And from the 1950s on, a tacit agreement underlay their partnership: France was the main political and military power in the bloc, and Germany was the main financial supporter (paying for, among other things, onerous subsidies for French farmers). After German reunification in 1990, France even pushed for the creation of the euro as another way to strengthen Paris’ links with Berlin.

Over the past decade, however, that relationship has shifted. Germany emerged in the wake of the 2008-09 financial crisis as the European Union’s most important political and economic power, while France struggled with a weakening economy and a string of ineffective, unpopular leaders. Berlin didn’t want to be seen as Europe’s hegemon, in light of its history, and made sure to keep Paris involved in decisions over how to deal with the problems in the eurozone. Even so, Germany pressured its peers in Southern Europe into introducing painful economic and institutional reforms that may not have happened had France been in charge.

Ten years after the crisis began, France has come to terms with Germany’s higher profile in European affairs. But accepting a position as Europe’s co-leader is not the same thing as accepting the role of second in command. As the leaders of the European Union begin hashing out the bloc’s future in the coming year, Paris will push to negotiate with Berlin on more equal terms. The question is whether the Franco-German alliance that managed to keep the bloc together in the past will be enough to preserve its unity in the future.

Unequal Footing 

France traditionally has been worried about an ascending Germany. In the 19th and 20th centuries, its concerns stemmed mainly from the military implications of Germany’s rise. In the 21st century, by contrast, they are mostly related to economic and political issues. Since the creation of the eurozone, France’s trade balance has turned from surplus to deficit, while Germany’s trade surplus has broken one record after another.

France’s gross domestic product grew by an average 0.8 percent each year from 2007-2016, fully half a percent lower than Germany’s average annual growth rate for that period. Unemployment in France, meanwhile, is twice as high as it is in Germany, and French voters are more dissatisfied with the political and economic status quo and less content with the European Union than their German neighbors are. (Their discontent explains why Euroskeptic and anti-globalization parties on the left and right alike performed so well in the French presidential election.)

France’s economic trouble is due in part to the country’s difficulty introducing reforms to become more competitive, but the problem also has a European dimension to it. To enact the policies in the bloc that Paris believes will help its economy, France needs Germany’s support. But unlike France, which tends to favor public spending to stimulate growth through consumption, Germany prefers fiscal discipline, low inflation and modest labor costs.

An Opportunity Arises 

Now, for the first time in a decade, Paris may be in the position to pursue a more balanced relationship with Berlin. France’s economy is growing again, and French President Emmanuel Macron, whose party has a solid majority in the National Assembly, has demonstrated his willingness to introduce the measures necessary to make that growth more sustainable. His vision for reforming the European Union has won the support not only of the French electorate but also of Southern European countries.

On top of Macron’s plans to increase public spending by introducing a separate budget for the eurozone with a finance minister to manage it, Italy and Spain added their own proposals, including common unemployment insurance and deposit insurance systems across the bloc. As the United Kingdom, a country whose views on the economy are close to those of Northern European states, prepares to leave the European Union, these southern countries will have a chance to increase their influence in the bloc.

Germany’s current political upheaval could also be an opportunity for France. If talks to form a coalition government fail and Germany holds an early election, the process of eurozone reform would be delayed by several months since the bloc can’t make any big decisions without Berlin. At the same time, though, Germany’s focus on domestic issues has created a temporary power vacuum in Europe that France is trying to fill. Macron has been on a diplomatic offensive in recent months pitching his ideas for the European Union’s future to leaders across the Continent. With Germany temporarily out of the picture, Paris will be able to intensify this strategy.

Compared with its recent predecessors, the current French government is more willing and ready to push its proposals for the European Union. Paris can argue that, unless the bloc implements significant reforms in the next few years, anti-EU forces could win the French presidency in 2022 and threaten the bloc’s continuity. From Germany’s perspective, moreover, a more balanced relationship between Berlin and Paris would placate Southern Europe after a decade of austerity policies.

* The publication is not an editorial. It reflects solely the point of view and argumentation of the author. The publication is presented in the presentation. Start in the previous issue. The original is available at :http://stratfor.com

* * *

GEOMETR.IT

Брюссель. Восточное партнерство «приказало долго жить»? 30.11.2017

50 лет назад Франция отказала Англии  30.11.2017

Triumph der Autokraten.- Триумф автократов. Германия  30.11.2017

Jak negocjować z Niemcami  30.11.2017

Schulz goes Canossa  30.11.2017

Moldova and it`s adventures 30.11.2017

Chaos in der Ukraine  30.11.2017

How the EU broke Ukraine 30.11.2017

GEOMETR.IT

6 Comments

  1. Great article title in this morning’s ‘The Telegraph’ newspaper: “Emmanuel Macron’s ‘inspirational’ EU dream is actually an authoritarian nightmare”.

  2. The EU is all about debates, talks, chats, events, discussions and dinners. No need to mention that all those get-togethers and summits are always taking place in the most exquisite venues, exclusive hotels, restaurants etc including also a horde of assistants and luxury escort girls. All paid for by the tax money of hard working people in all of the EU.

  3. Much talk and little action, no accountability and no success-related remuneration. That’s the business model of the EU. A self-serving elite doing nothing but getting paid for absolutely nothing substantial but costing more than any national government or government officials.

  4. And “informal” in EU speak means basically a social event with a high entertainment character where the agenda is purely symbolic and no substantial measurable output is either desired nor expected.

  5. And just one final note. Of course Tusk or rather his office is only doing what he is told to. He is nothing more than an extremely well paid secretary official who has little to none real executive and decision power within the EU.

  6. And just one final note. Of course Tusk or rather his office is only doing what he is told to. He is nothing more than an extremely well paid secretary official who has little to none real executive and decision power within the EU

Добавить комментарий

Your email address will not be published.

Latest from

Go to Top