1. Trimarium. Something brand new

in Balkans 2017 · Culture 2017 · Danube 2017 · Economics 2017 · EN · Europe 2017 · Industry 2017 · Moldova 2017 · Nation 2017 · Politics 2017 · Polska 2017 · Skepticism 2017 · Ukraine 2017 186 views / 5 comments
71% посетителей прочитало эту публикацию

Balkans     Baltics       Belarus     Danube    Europe                Ukraine           Ex-USSR         Moldova       Polska

GEOMETR.IT         neweasterneurope.eu


With US President Donald Trump’s visit in Poland, the brand of the Three Seas Initiative gained international reputation. In Poland where the roots of the initiative began, the Three Seas or – as one can Latinise it, Trimarium – initiative is often confused with the historical project of Intermarium, intuitively understood by many. Not only journalists but also politicians and even public officials contribute to the confusion. Well, they are wrong.

Last August in Dubrovnik, Croatia, the heads of 12 states signed the “Three Seas Declaration”. Its aim is to strengthen the economic and infrastructural ties between the member states. The signatories represent: the four countries of the Visegrad Group (Poland, Hungary, Czech Republic and Slovakia), the three Baltic states (Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania) together with Austria, Romania, Bulgaria and two Adriatic countries: Croatia and Slovenia. All 12 countries concerned are members of the European Union.

The initiative should be regarded as a great diplomatic success of the Polish president, Andrzej Duda, and his advisor for international affairs, Krzysztof Szczerski. Prof. Szczerski is a political scientist who graduated from the same Jagiellonian University in Kraków (Duda is an alum there as well).

The outline of the Trimarium idea can be found in a book by Krzysztof Szczerski published this year under the quite adventurous title: The European Utopia: Integration Crisis and Polish Initiative of Remedy. The author describes the crisis currently touching the institutional and ideological dimensions of the EU. In a straightforward manner he develops the diagnosis and discusses possible remedies. The map of the historical Intermarium has been included into the chapter of the book where the Three Seas Initiative is presented.

It shows the central belt of the European continent with the countries from Finland in the north to Greece and Albania in the south, none of them touched by Stalin’s territorial annexations of the 1940s. The borderline of the current Trimarium Initiative follows the eastern border of the European Union (around 300 km to the west comparing to the Intermarium eastern reach) and strengthens its run as stated in the set of Stalin’s agreements with Hitler from 1939-1940.

Neither Finland, Greece nor Albania expressed interested in or was invited to the current Trimarium project. What’s yet more surprising is the access of the cautious Austria. If Austria decided to take join, then the geopolitical audacity of the project has had to be as significant as something of a Liechtenstein level.

Polish journalists and politicians, including the minister of national defense, while confusing the current, Liechtenstein-level project with the historical Intermarium audacity, wrongly interpret this. It was the presidential adviser Szczerski himself who stated clearly in a recent TV debate.

First, the Trimarium remains a purely economic project of mutual co-operation, it has no geopolitical connotations that would associate it with the historical Intermarium

Second, the Trimarium gathers exclusively member states of the European Union, even if “there were various submissions” Szczerski affirms. One should think about Ukraine first and foremost. Its absence within the initiative is telling.

Dariusz Góra-Szopiński chairs the department of regional strategic studies at the Cardinal Stefan Wyszyński University of Warsaw, Poland.

This text is part of the series titled: “Intermarium in the 21st century” based on the conference held on July 6-7 2017, Lazarski University in Warsaw.

* The publication is not an editorial. It reflects solely the point of view and argumentation of the author. The publication is presented in the presentation. Start in the previous issue. The original is available at :/http://neweasterneurope.eu

* * *


Чем опасен конфликт Нафтогаз contra Киев. Взгляд из Европы  30.10.2017

Австро-Венгрия. Когда бравый солдат Швейк скрутит дулю Евросоюзу ?  30.10.2017

Команча, Фляшенхальс, Прекмурье…12 государств. Они могли быть в ЕС  30.10.2017

Почему Молдовой правят политики с рейтингом в 1% ? 30.10.2017

Грузинский митинг в Киеве или «Мелкий бес» Ф.Сологуба  30.10.2017

Verschuldend in der Welt  30.10.2017

Polska nie musi 30.10.2017

Ukraine: What next? 30.10.2017

Moldova. Changing the rules of the game  30.10.2017



  1. In a recent opinion piece, Wojciech Przybylski warned that Donald Trump’s endorsement of the Three Seas Initiative coupled with the subsequent politics of the Polish government may overshadow the Visegrad Group. I really cannot see why something like this should happen and why the countries involved in the initiative would be marginalized in the EU as a consequence

  2. the Three Seas Inititative (TSI) is a very useful geopolitical idea and a new instrument of European integration. It will rather bring appreciation, not isolation, to the countries involved. Furthermore, the active support for the TSI by the president of the United States, whether one likes him or not, can only help.

  3. However, it is true that “Three Seas” and “Inter Seas” labels were frequently mixed up in the Polish media by journalists, analysts and pundits, which might have resulted in some international confusion. The present attitude of Czech diplomacy suggests more work should be done to avoid negative connotations here.

  4. Firstly, Germany is the European leader and remains in the same EU camp as Poland, so there is no point in constructing a structure to counter Russia-Germany cooperation. Secondly, no coalition of countries between Russia and Germany could counter their cooperative power.

  5. Certainly, some Polish politicians are known from being prone to confrontational or crude enunciations and international communication of Polish foreign policy should be worked on.

Добавить комментарий

Your email address will not be published.

Latest from

Go to Top