Political «to be or not to be»

in Balkans 2018 · Baltics 2018 · Conflicts 2018 · Crisis 2018 · Culture 2018 · Europe 2018 · Germany 2018 · Great Britain 2018 · Literature 2018 · Person 2018 · Politics 2018 · Skepticism 2018 · Ukraine 2018 140 views / 6 comments
          
94% посетителей прочитало эту публикацию

Germany     Great Britain  Europe         USA     World         Ex-USSR

GEOMETR.IT   standard.co.uk

 

*Shakespeare warned us

It was rather glorious serendipity. At almost exactly the same moment as Donald Trump was giving his first State of the Union address to a deeply divided Congress, Nicholas Hytner’s production of Julius Caesar was opening at the new Bridge Theatre on the South Bank.

Now, as it happens, a different production of the same Shakespeare play has already caused a huge row in the US, because of the tyrant Caesar’s passing resemblance to a certain blow-dried, orange-faced property tycoon now in possession of the Oval Office.

According to Professor Peter Holland, an eminent Shakespearean scholar, after The Public Theater production in New York: “Shakespeare companies all across the US began to receive hate mail, even though most recipients were not even performing the play. The name Shakespeare was apparently enough to warrant the ill wishes….”

It was at the very least a reassuring sign that the Bard remains relevant, though also a warning about the dangers of artists getting too close to politics. As Holland reminds us, during Shakespeare’s play the poet Cinna is mistaken by the enraged mob for one of the conspirators, who had the same surname, and torn to pieces. When he protests his innocence they roar that it’s no matter: “Tear him for his bad verses! Tear him for his bad verses!”

It is a grimly comic moment. One of the great virtues of this new production is that it brings home to us just how extremely violent Ancient Rome was at the end of the Republic. By substituting pistols and machine guns for daggers and swords, and bombarding the audience with explosions, Hytner rips away the gentility of traditional toga-and-laurel-leaf Shakespearean settings. His Rome looks and sounds more like today’s Syria.

That is surely right. If you want a gripping, easy primer to the world Shakespeare is describing in this play, then it is the trilogy of novels by Robert Harris (coincidentally recently adapted by the RSC) about Cicero — briefly name-checked in Julius Caesar.

We all know about the bloodiness of the assassination itself but Harris depicts homicidal gangs of unemployed gladiators roaming the city and military murder squads hunting down enemies of the state. Cicero himself died by having his neck cut, and then his head, hands removed and pinned up in public in the Forum. Mark Antony’s enraged wife, Fulvia, then had Cicero’s eloquent, dissident tongue pulled out and stabbed it with her hairpin. Even for a lawyer, this was a rough ending.

The bigger question is whether Shakespeare’s Rome has real lessons for us today. Julius Caesar is often played as a military dictator, a swaggering, populist hard man who deserves what’s coming to him. And certainly, Shakespeare is interestingly sympathetic to the conspirators — in this production Brutus, “the noblest Roman”, is played by Ben Whishaw as a geeky, punctilious intellectual, though in fairness I guess he would find it pretty difficult to play a beefy thug.

Anyway, no modern person should shed a tear for Caesar. He himself boasted that his military campaign in France resulted in the deaths of at least 1.2 million people in battle, and it is thought at least as many died through starvation afterwards. Up to one in three of the population of what was then called Gaul disappeared. This makes him one of the biggest genocidal killers in history — as bad in his way as the Black Death. A third of all people! After the Siege of Uxellodunum in the Dordogne in 51 BC, he cut off the hands of all survivors and sent them home to wave their stumps and tell of his mercy.

Trump? Kim Jong-un? No, not even Stalin or Hitler — there is no modern equivalent to the historic Caesar at all, thank God.

Trump? Kim Jong-un? No, not even Stalin or Hitler — there is no modern equivalent to the historic Caesar

Andrew Marr

But Shakespeare is nuanced, and it’s dangerous to look for contemporary lessons. He was a lifelong democracy-sceptic. From the English history plays to Rome, the mob is, in his view, easily led and dangerous. Commoners can be easily whipped up into xenophobic hatred of immigrants (Sir Thomas More) and are ludicrously easy to flatter (Coriolanus). We should not forget that Shakespeare ended his life as a relatively wealthy man.

For him, the hard question is about the nature of authority. His Caesar is not a monster — David Calder plays him in this production as a man over-familiar with power but with natural authority and a certain pleasant easiness. His crime is forgetting that Rome was a free Republic, which allows Shakespeare to praise what is, effectively, regicide — rather dangerous in front of Elizabeth I’s censors.

But he is absolutely clear that cutting off ultimate authority, even to stop dictatorship, is incredibly risky. In Rome it leads to civil war and extreme violence. If we think of Brutus, Cassius and the other conspirators as revolutionaries, then the revolution soon eats its children. Noble Romans, or not, they have led their state into chaos, which will only ultimately be resolved by the arrival of the next Caesar.

So although Hytner’s production is a roaring, exuberant, ear-splitting celebration of popular culture, from rock music through to football-fan galumphing, the play is at heart a warning about the dangers of anarchy and political breakdown. I had forgotten how, 40 years before it happened, Shakespeare was eerily predicting the fall of the British state and the civil wars here. Charles I played Caesar; Cromwell and Ireton were Brutus and Cassius; and the flamboyant Merrie Monarch himself, Charles II, comes back like Caesar Augustus.

https://www.standard.co.uk

* * *

GEOMETR.IT

Если б не было Майдана?  06.02.2018

ТРАМП — это американский ГОРБАЧЁВ 06.02.2018

Украина, Болгария и вся Европа — один сценарий  06.02.2018

ЧЕХИЯ. Победа Харизмы над Европейской Серостью 06.02.2018

1932 год. Изящная жизнь в Одессе  06.02.2018

USA. ПОПКОРН и ИСТИНА 06.02.2018

Wer bringt Serbien und Bosnien zusammen?  06.02.2018

Polnische politische Mythen06.02.2018

Post-Davos  06.02.2018

Say Hello and Goodbye to The Third World 06.02.2018

GEOMETR.IT

6 Comments

  1. Now an exhibition by the Royal Shakespeare Company suggests that Gove is in esteemed political company having been compared so effusively to one of the bard’s most famous creations.

  2. Antony’s speech has often been seized upon by cartoonists seeking to highlight displays of disingenuous political posturing. The cartoonist Peter Shrank notably depicted Blair as Antony when the then Labour leader was seeking to dilute trade union power early on during his time at the top of the party.

  3. The exhibition curator suggests it is only a matter of time before Theresa May gets the Lady Macbeth treatment. “It’s an inevitability that if you are a woman in high office you will be compared to Lady Macbeth at some point,” says Francis Taylor. “For better of worse, Lady Macbeth is the image of political womanhood that we have in our culture.”

  4. We would be wrong, however, to equate preservation of a culture with religious conservatism or quietism in the face of a modern world. The Dalai Lama has shown time again that religious traditions have the capacity of innovate, adopt, even coopt modern influences for their own growth and success

  5. Please be polite, and avoid your passions turning into contempt for others. We may delete posts that are rude or aggressive; or edit posts containing contact details or links to other websites.

  6. So excellent a king; that was, to this, Hyperion to a satyr; so loving to my mother, That he might not beteem the winds of heaven Visit her face too roughly. Heaven and earth! Must I remember?

Добавить комментарий

Your email address will not be published.