The Merkel-Schulz showdown

in Conflicts 2017 · Crisis 2017 · Economics 2017 · EN · Geopolitics · Nation 2017 · Person 2017 123 views / 6 comments
94% посетителей прочитало эту публикацию



BERLIN — Sunday night’s debate between German Chancellor Angela Merkel and her Social Democrat challenger Martin Schulz (the only confrontation between the two) was billed as “TV duel.” Afterward, exasperated German analysts described it as more of a “duet.”

The pair was largely in unison on most of the key issues, from refugees to pensions, making the 97-minute exchange challenging viewing. Despite the lack of fireworks, the debate will have an impact on the rest of the German campaign.

Here are five takeaways from the debate. 

  1. The race for first place is over 

With less than three weeks left until the September 24 election, Schulz, whose Social Democrats trail Merkel’s Christian Democrats by about 15 percentage points in the polls, needed to emerge as the clear winner. He fell short.

Several post-debate polls published by Germany’s public broadcasters gave the chancellor the win. In the largest sample, 55 percent said Merkel emerged victorious, a crushing defeat for Schulz, who struggled to find his footing. In the words of one TV commentator: “The debate will neither hurt Merkel nor will it help Schulz.”

The outcome was all the more surprising given Merkel is not known as a particularly strong debater. True to form, she largely stuck to her usual talking points, offering no surprises. Even so, viewers found her to be more competent, more likeable and more credible.

  1. Martin Schulz is fighting for his political survival 

For Schulz, the campaign is not about becoming chancellor, but getting enough votes to remain SPD chairman. Despite a strong start after announcing his candidacy earlier this year, Schulz failed to maintain momentum. If the SPD finishes significantly below the 25.7 percent it garnered in 2013, the former European Parliament president will almost certainly be forced out.

  1. The only question now is who will govern with Merkel 

That will largely depend on how the liberal Free Democrats (FDP) and the Greens perform at the ballot box. The next three weeks will be about the race for third. Many conservatives would prefer to reprise their traditional alliance with FDP, which was voted out of parliament in 2013 but is on course to rejoin. That said, even if the FDP makes it back into the Bundestag, the center-right parties may need to get the Greens on board for a majority — a challenging prospect.

  1. A grand coalition remains a strong possibility

At several points during the debate, Schulz turned to Merkel to say he agreed with her, once even congratulating her response by declaring “à la bonne heure.The rapport is genuine. For better or worse, Merkel and Schulz agree on most issues, a reality that could help pave the way to another grand coalition, especially if a three-way tie-up between the Christian Democrats, the FDP and Greens proves too complicated.

  1. Germany needs a new debate format 

Sunday’s debate with four moderators quizzing the two candidates was awkward to say the least.

The moderators, all TV personalities from Germany’s big broadcasters, struggled to elicit anything but boilerplate responses. They spent the first hour focused on refugee policy, an area where Merkel and Schulz largely agree, instead of zeroing in on social issues and other areas where the differences between the candidates are more pronounced.

As one undecided young voter told public television afterward: The debate “confirmed what I already know. There wasn’t really anything new.”


Matthew Karnitschnig

 * * *


2. Тирасполь. Место столкновение цивилизаций – Запада и России?  04.09.2017

2. Кубанские казаки поют о Трампе: Каким ты был — таким ты и остался!  04.09.2017

Bundeawahl. TV-Pseudoduell  04.09.2017

1. Weaponizing Ukraine  04.09.2017

1. Молдова, бойся своих детей. Они тебе отомстят!  04.09.2017



  1. According to the first poll, which was carried out halfway through the debate, 44% of viewers found Merkel more convincing than Schulz, whom only 32% found convincing. That result may change, but the Social Democrat had more momentum on foreign policy in the first half, and looked less coherent on domestic issues in the second. To change the momentum in this election campaign, this certainly wouldn’t be enough.

  2. Shortly after this tweet was sent, the candidates were in fact asked whether it was a good idea to hold the 2022 World Cup in Qatar. Merkel thought it was “not a particularly good idea”.

  3. And as predicted earlier, Merkel simply shrugs her shoulders and points out that the Social Democrats voted for the toll, too. Schulz is getting a bit too technical on domestic issues; you can tell he has spent the last few months catching up on policy issues and is now trying to show off how much he has learnt.

  4. On Trump, Schulz’s bluster comes to very little. Merkel just has to cite the list of people she is due to talk with over the phone tomorrow and she immediately comes across as the grown-up in the room

  5. On Trump, Schulz’s bluster comes to very little. Merkel just has to cite the list of people she is due to talk with over the phone tomorrow and she immediately comes across as the grown-up in the room

Добавить комментарий

Your email address will not be published.

Latest from

Go to Top